Recent Posts
Archives
- July 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- June 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
Categories
- Abstraction
- Admin
- Analytic/Continental
- Blogging
- Book
- Capital v.1
- City Planning
- Coffee
- Cognitive Science
- Contradiction
- Conversations
- Courses
- Critical Theory
- Critique
- Current Events
- Dialogue
- Drafts
- Ecology
- Empiricism
- Events
- Family
- Fetish
- Fieldwork
- Grundrisse
- Intellectual Property
- Interdisciplinary
- Linguistics
- Links
- Logic
- Logic of Science
- Marxes
- Materialism
- Math and Science
- Metatheory
- Methodology
- Miscellaneous
- Negations
- Overheard
- Phenomenology of Spirit
- Philosophy of History
- Political Economy
- Politics
- Procrastination
- Professional Life
- Psychology
- Reading
- Reading Group
- Reification
- Religion
- Self-Reflexivity
- Social Movements
- Social Science
- Sociology of Knowledge
- Supervision
- Teaching
- Technology
- Thesis
- Transformation
- Writing
Advertisements
Is it just me, or does anyone else see a shark that’s been harpooned by ‘characteristics’?
Yeah, see, I thought it was a sort of squishy Australia…
My favourite part part of this was the massive “therefore” (on the far right-hand bottom corner of “labour”) – surely I don’t use the word that much? (Evidently, I do… ;-P)
I saw a squished Aust too, first up. But I do like the shark; particularly one heading in *that* direction, harpooned by characteristics.
That wordle thing rocks. *Now* I know what my thesis is about. Given my abysmal progress of late (at least in producing stuff ‘worthy’ of handing over) and an important meeting looming, perhaps I could present my wordle instead – it’s all there, and presented much more eloquently than I could ever do with bothersome things like sentences.
It’s a pig! Commodity is in the nose and the tail has characteristics. 🙂
I sure hope the order we put the words in and the relations among them are of some importance. Otherwise I’m just doing freakin’ word lists from now on and wordling them up for that insta-view of smart.
Come to think of it, there may be a writing pedagogy in here somewhere…
Carl sees capitalist pigs, and Lynda an assault on a rightward-travelling shark… Hmm….
Can’t it be both? Oooo how immanently critical 😉
On ‘therefore’ prevalence – does that mean your thesis is riddled with identification of causality… you trend bucker, you.
And all of this squished in Australia… I’ll leave that one alone…
Personally, I like the way that in this particular representation of the antagonism between capital and labour, the former is so small that it doesn’t even span the two centre characters of the latter.
Heh. I’ve just noticed that there’s “capital” and there’s “Capital”…
rob – Yes, well, I do keep writing about “the dual character of capital”… ;-P But I hadn’t noticed the little “capital” hovering above the behemoth labour – that’s lovely.
Lynda – yes, could be causality – could just be that capital logic stuff rubbing off on me – therefore, therefore, therefore… 😉
I see a submarine, very like the ‘we all live in a yellow’ one. With the characteristics being the thing you look through… what the hell is it called??
Not sure about an image of down under… characteristics makes a very small state of queensland. Russell and the ‘red north’ would not be happy.