Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On…
October 18, 2006
Posted by on
Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on.
Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28.
Bromberger, Sylvain (2002) “Chomsky’s Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 7, April 25 (with reply by John Searle).
Chomsky, Noam (2002) “Chomsky’s Revolution: An Exchange” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no 12, July 18 (with reply by John Searle).
I should note that Searle’s initial volley is available only to subscribers, although the other two pieces are open for public view.
I’ve also decided that this extended digression into Chomsky brings out the worst in the reading group: when I pointed the other members to this exchange, and also mentioned that Searle’s piece was available only to subscribers, the following email exchange ensued:
First response: “After a brief review it strikes me as wrong in general to criticise Chomsky in public…”
My reply: “but what goes on between consenting adults in private is perfectly fine…”
Third response: “Unless one of the parties is manufacturing consent…”