Comments on: The (Updated) Gist http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/ Theory In The Rough Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: lisa http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1979 Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:46:59 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1979 I see a submarine, very like the ‘we all live in a yellow’ one. With the characteristics being the thing you look through… what the hell is it called??

Not sure about an image of down under… characteristics makes a very small state of queensland. Russell and the ‘red north’ would not be happy.

]]> By: N Pepperell http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1978 Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:01:40 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1978 rob – Yes, well, I do keep writing about “the dual character of capital”… ;-P But I hadn’t noticed the little “capital” hovering above the behemoth labour – that’s lovely.

Lynda – yes, could be causality – could just be that capital logic stuff rubbing off on me – therefore, therefore, therefore… ;-)

]]> By: rob http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1977 Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:52:45 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1977 Heh. I’ve just noticed that there’s “capital” and there’s “Capital”…

]]> By: rob http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1976 Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:51:29 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1976 Personally, I like the way that in this particular representation of the antagonism between capital and labour, the former is so small that it doesn’t even span the two centre characters of the latter.

]]> By: Lynda http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1975 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:31:50 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1975 Can’t it be both? Oooo how immanently critical ;-)
On ‘therefore’ prevalence – does that mean your thesis is riddled with identification of causality… you trend bucker, you.
And all of this squished in Australia… I’ll leave that one alone…

]]> By: N Pepperell http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1974 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:03:51 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1974 Carl sees capitalist pigs, and Lynda an assault on a rightward-travelling shark… Hmm….

]]> By: Carl http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1973 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:22:48 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1973 It’s a pig! Commodity is in the nose and the tail has characteristics. :)

I sure hope the order we put the words in and the relations among them are of some importance. Otherwise I’m just doing freakin’ word lists from now on and wordling them up for that insta-view of smart.

Come to think of it, there may be a writing pedagogy in here somewhere…

]]> By: Lynda http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1972 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:53:33 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1972 I saw a squished Aust too, first up. But I do like the shark; particularly one heading in *that* direction, harpooned by characteristics.
That wordle thing rocks. *Now* I know what my thesis is about. Given my abysmal progress of late (at least in producing stuff ‘worthy’ of handing over) and an important meeting looming, perhaps I could present my wordle instead – it’s all there, and presented much more eloquently than I could ever do with bothersome things like sentences.

]]> By: N Pepperell http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1971 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:14:35 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1971 Yeah, see, I thought it was a sort of squishy Australia…

My favourite part part of this was the massive “therefore” (on the far right-hand bottom corner of “labour”) – surely I don’t use the word that much? (Evidently, I do… ;-P)

]]> By: Lynda http://roughtheory.org/2008/07/24/the-gist/#comment-1970 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:04:16 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=827#comment-1970 Is it just me, or does anyone else see a shark that’s been harpooned by ‘characteristics’?

]]>