<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bits of Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2008/02/06/bits-of-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2008/02/06/bits-of-books/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2008/02/06/bits-of-books/#comment-1599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Pepperell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/bits-of-books/#comment-1599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol - I&#039;m not actually trying to pick on the students :-)  I do know that this is fairly common (and, of course, all of us read &quot;bits&quot; of books when trying to decide what books we&#039;ll read in detail).  I think, to be honest, the exchange struck me so strongly because I&#039;ve been writing intensively, and in the process thinking so much about the interrelation of parts of an overarching argument - there&#039;s an element of... mortality, in a way, in being reminded that this is, very likely, how whatever I will produce will ultimately be read...  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol &#8211; I&#8217;m not actually trying to pick on the students <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I do know that this is fairly common (and, of course, all of us read &#8220;bits&#8221; of books when trying to decide what books we&#8217;ll read in detail).  I think, to be honest, the exchange struck me so strongly because I&#8217;ve been writing intensively, and in the process thinking so much about the interrelation of parts of an overarching argument &#8211; there&#8217;s an element of&#8230; mortality, in a way, in being reminded that this is, very likely, how whatever I will produce will ultimately be read&#8230;  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2008/02/06/bits-of-books/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/bits-of-books/#comment-1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to be fair, I know professors who will say the same thing....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be fair, I know professors who will say the same thing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

