<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preparing for Fragmentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/12/20/preparing-for-fragmentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/12/20/preparing-for-fragmentation/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/12/20/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Pepperell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-1461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Adam - I had considered the Postone, but it&#039;s fairly dense text, for the most part.  He might have an article that might be more appropriate - it might be worth my hunting around in his other publications to see.  I had also considered the Horkheimer but, on a look back, feel that it&#039;s probably also too dense.  It&#039;s sort of reassuring, though, to hear similar things come to mind for someone else :-)

I&#039;ve considered perhaps some excerpts from more aphoristically structured Frankfurt School material.  I&#039;ve also considered using part of Postone&#039;s chapter on the first generation Frankfurt School, as that one is a bit more accessible, I think, than the more theoretical chapters.

The Geuss is a good idea - I&#039;ll have a flip through and see what could be excerpted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam &#8211; I had considered the Postone, but it&#8217;s fairly dense text, for the most part.  He might have an article that might be more appropriate &#8211; it might be worth my hunting around in his other publications to see.  I had also considered the Horkheimer but, on a look back, feel that it&#8217;s probably also too dense.  It&#8217;s sort of reassuring, though, to hear similar things come to mind for someone else <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve considered perhaps some excerpts from more aphoristically structured Frankfurt School material.  I&#8217;ve also considered using part of Postone&#8217;s chapter on the first generation Frankfurt School, as that one is a bit more accessible, I think, than the more theoretical chapters.</p>
<p>The Geuss is a good idea &#8211; I&#8217;ll have a flip through and see what could be excerpted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Leeds</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/12/20/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Leeds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first two chapters of Postone&#039;s Time, Labor, and Social Domination would be my obvious first pick. Also, that Horkheimer essay, Traditional and Critical Theory. But I&#039;m not sure if those count as &quot;accessible&quot;. More accessible might be the little book (or chapters of it) by Raymond Geuss, The Idea of a Critical Theory, that lays out the arguments for different kinds of Marxist theories called &#039;critical&#039; very very clearly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first two chapters of Postone&#8217;s Time, Labor, and Social Domination would be my obvious first pick. Also, that Horkheimer essay, Traditional and Critical Theory. But I&#8217;m not sure if those count as &#8220;accessible&#8221;. More accessible might be the little book (or chapters of it) by Raymond Geuss, The Idea of a Critical Theory, that lays out the arguments for different kinds of Marxist theories called &#8216;critical&#8217; very very clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

