<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What in the hell&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/what-in-the-hell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/what-in-the-hell/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/what-in-the-hell/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/what-in-the-hell/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey NP,
this is really helpful, thanks, and I&#039;m glad the post was generative instead of annoying. I&#039;m grounded too, so it&#039;ll be some time before I&#039;m able to respond. Among the things that helped were your remarks about your presentation as focusing on what you think you have established by argument - being &quot;more cautious - deliberately so - than [your] own opinions about Marx’s work.&quot; I&#039;m off to bed. I&#039;ll get back to you eventually.
take care,
Nate]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey NP,<br />
this is really helpful, thanks, and I&#8217;m glad the post was generative instead of annoying. I&#8217;m grounded too, so it&#8217;ll be some time before I&#8217;m able to respond. Among the things that helped were your remarks about your presentation as focusing on what you think you have established by argument &#8211; being &#8220;more cautious &#8211; deliberately so &#8211; than [your] own opinions about Marx’s work.&#8221; I&#8217;m off to bed. I&#8217;ll get back to you eventually.<br />
take care,<br />
Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

