<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRCT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/irct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/irct/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/11/29/irct/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/irct/#comment-1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi NP,
Oh yeah of course, do whatever you like. I&#039;m glad  my attempts at rhetorical flourish worked for you (you&#039;re a philosophy person, though). I really like that kind of thing, like when Austin says something about letting his cats onto the table or when Russell makes a joke about Hegelians arguing the present king of France wheres a toupee. Those are lame jokes, but I like them. I also tried to be cute as compensation because I thought I wasn&#039;t doing justice to your post, glad it worked for you and wasn&#039;t annoying. 
Re: the more substantive stuff, I look forward to hearing what you have to say. I&#039;m going to be slow in replying probably (god I hope so, otherwise I really will miss a deadline if I blog instead of work - this is way funner than that work; stupid work). 
take care,
Nate]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi NP,<br />
Oh yeah of course, do whatever you like. I&#8217;m glad  my attempts at rhetorical flourish worked for you (you&#8217;re a philosophy person, though). I really like that kind of thing, like when Austin says something about letting his cats onto the table or when Russell makes a joke about Hegelians arguing the present king of France wheres a toupee. Those are lame jokes, but I like them. I also tried to be cute as compensation because I thought I wasn&#8217;t doing justice to your post, glad it worked for you and wasn&#8217;t annoying.<br />
Re: the more substantive stuff, I look forward to hearing what you have to say. I&#8217;m going to be slow in replying probably (god I hope so, otherwise I really will miss a deadline if I blog instead of work &#8211; this is way funner than that work; stupid work).<br />
take care,<br />
Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

