<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1:  Not Knowing Where to Have It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/14/capital_1i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/14/capital_1i/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Relativism, Absolutes, and the Present as History</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/14/capital_1i/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Relativism, Absolutes, and the Present as History]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1i/#comment-1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In earlier posts, I’ve made the claim that, in spite of appearances, Marx isn’t outlining an historical development of capitalism in this section. When I say “in spite of appearances”, this is because there are moments in the text where it looks very strongly like Marx is doing precisely that, so my claim about textual strategy is not immediately or self-evidently true. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In earlier posts, I’ve made the claim that, in spite of appearances, Marx isn’t outlining an historical development of capitalism in this section. When I say “in spite of appearances”, this is because there are moments in the text where it looks very strongly like Marx is doing precisely that, so my claim about textual strategy is not immediately or self-evidently true. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

