http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/ Theory In The Rough Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/#comment-1222 Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:19:20 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-1222 [...] The passage suggests that there is a material content – use value – that is timeless and “true”, which comes in history to be covered over by arbitrary social “forms”, which are contingent and ephemeral. [...]

]]> http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/#comment-1221 Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:45:54 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-1221 [...] the last instalment, I suggested that the first chapter should be read as a sort of immanent dialectical unfolding of [...]

]]> http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/#comment-1220 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:44:47 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-1220 [...] Roughtheory’s fabulous series of posts on the first chapter of Capital, the latest of which here, and Scandalum Magnatum’s insightful notes on Keynes, the latest of which is [...]

]]> http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/#comment-1219 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:13:54 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-1219 [...] quotes a passage that expresses one of the forms of perception and thought I’ve recently been suggesting Marx is trying to ground in Capital – the distinction between a timeless “material” [...]

]]> http://roughtheory.org/2007/10/10/capital_1h/#comment-1218 Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:40:46 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-1218 [...] Subjects, Objects and Things in Between [...]

]]>