<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fragment on Textual Strategy in Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Scratchpad: How Must the Science Begin? (Not This Way, Surely&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Scratchpad: How Must the Science Begin? (Not This Way, Surely&#8230;)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the fold this goes - a sort of framing mini-chapter, intended to do roughly the same work that the &#8220;Fragment on the Textual Strategy of Capital&#8220; post did for the blog series on Capital, now that I&#8217;m finally ready (as I had mentioned [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the fold this goes &#8211; a sort of framing mini-chapter, intended to do roughly the same work that the &#8220;Fragment on the Textual Strategy of Capital&#8220; post did for the blog series on Capital, now that I&#8217;m finally ready (as I had mentioned [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: What Is the &#8220;Social Character of Labour&#8221; in Capitalism?</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: What Is the &#8220;Social Character of Labour&#8221; in Capitalism?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] thinking out loud a bit about what Marx means by the following comment, from the section on commodity fetishism:

    This Fetishism of commodities has its origin, as the foregoing analysis has already shown, in the peculiar social character of the labour that produces them.

So what is the peculiar social character of this labour? [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thinking out loud a bit about what Marx means by the following comment, from the section on commodity fetishism:</p>
<p>    This Fetishism of commodities has its origin, as the foregoing analysis has already shown, in the peculiar social character of the labour that produces them.</p>
<p>So what is the peculiar social character of this labour? [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Modernities Conference Talk</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Modernities Conference Talk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I’ve posted the conference talk to the Modernities: Radicalism, Reflexivity, Realities conference below the fold [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve posted the conference talk to the Modernities: Radicalism, Reflexivity, Realities conference below the fold [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Random Metatheory</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Random Metatheory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What I want to do in this post, is not so much answer Nate&#039;s questions directly, as use the thought-space that those questions have opened as an excuse, first, to explore some of the implications of this reading of &lt;em&gt;Capital&lt;/em&gt;for how we can conceptualise critical judgements about competing forms of theory and practice generated immanently within capitalism.  And second, to talk a bit about how this kind of theory involves a form of &lt;em&gt;relativising&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;locating&lt;/em&gt;, or &lt;em&gt;situating&lt;/em&gt; dispositions (intuitive forms of perception and thought) by demonstrating at least one dimension of collective practice in which such dispositions are &lt;em&gt;enacted&lt;/em&gt;, without, however, &lt;em&gt;reducing&lt;/em&gt; dispositions to the theorised form of enactment (i.e., without claiming that the theorised form of enactment is the &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; space in which such dispositions are enacted), and without automatically &lt;em&gt;undermining&lt;/em&gt; the validity of such dispositions (i.e., without acting as though &lt;em&gt;situating&lt;/em&gt; a disposition &lt;em&gt;by itself&lt;/em&gt; suffices to debunk the insights or potentials that disposition expresses). [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What I want to do in this post, is not so much answer Nate&#8217;s questions directly, as use the thought-space that those questions have opened as an excuse, first, to explore some of the implications of this reading of <em>Capital</em>for how we can conceptualise critical judgements about competing forms of theory and practice generated immanently within capitalism.  And second, to talk a bit about how this kind of theory involves a form of <em>relativising</em>, <em>locating</em>, or <em>situating</em> dispositions (intuitive forms of perception and thought) by demonstrating at least one dimension of collective practice in which such dispositions are <em>enacted</em>, without, however, <em>reducing</em> dispositions to the theorised form of enactment (i.e., without claiming that the theorised form of enactment is the <em>only</em> space in which such dispositions are enacted), and without automatically <em>undermining</em> the validity of such dispositions (i.e., without acting as though <em>situating</em> a disposition <em>by itself</em> suffices to debunk the insights or potentials that disposition expresses). [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Cartesian Fragment</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Cartesian Fragment]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Marx is therefore already, in these earliest passages, describing, not simply a relation of humans to an external world, but a relation of humans to themselves - a mode of embodiment and self-experience, that incorporates a felt distinction between material bodies, cultural or social shaping of those material bodies, and a disembodied, contemplative “ghost in the machine” that experiences itself as having “discovered” an intrinsic division between matter and society. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marx is therefore already, in these earliest passages, describing, not simply a relation of humans to an external world, but a relation of humans to themselves &#8211; a mode of embodiment and self-experience, that incorporates a felt distinction between material bodies, cultural or social shaping of those material bodies, and a disembodied, contemplative “ghost in the machine” that experiences itself as having “discovered” an intrinsic division between matter and society. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Not Knowing Where to Have It</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Not Knowing Where to Have It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] complex critical strategy that motivates this presentation (discussed in more detail in previous posts) enables Marx to avoid unfolding his critique in the name of some kind of objective [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complex critical strategy that motivates this presentation (discussed in more detail in previous posts) enables Marx to avoid unfolding his critique in the name of some kind of objective [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural&#8217;s Not In It &#171; Grundlegung</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natural&#8217;s Not In It &#171; Grundlegung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Fragment on Textual Strategy in Capital [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fragment on Textual Strategy in Capital [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Subjects, Objects and Things in Between</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Subjects, Objects and Things in Between]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nevertheless, this small hint begins to react back on the modes of presentation with which this text begins, and the strategic intention of the earlier sections becomes a bit clearer. At this point, it begins to become clear that the opening definitions, which appear to concern certain economic concepts about material wealth, are always and already quite sweeping categories capturing forms of subjectivity - encompassing modes of the experience of self, forms of embodiment, possible means of practising selves in their self-relation, relation to others, and relation to a nonhuman environment. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevertheless, this small hint begins to react back on the modes of presentation with which this text begins, and the strategic intention of the earlier sections becomes a bit clearer. At this point, it begins to become clear that the opening definitions, which appear to concern certain economic concepts about material wealth, are always and already quite sweeping categories capturing forms of subjectivity &#8211; encompassing modes of the experience of self, forms of embodiment, possible means of practising selves in their self-relation, relation to others, and relation to a nonhuman environment. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Value and Its Form - from Deduction to Dialectic</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Value and Its Form - from Deduction to Dialectic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I read this section, among other things, as Marx’s somewhat playful virtuoso demonstration of the ease with which he can surpass Hegel by embedding certain core concepts of “dialectics” by revealing the ways in which certain dimensions of collective practice possess practically dialectical properties.[...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read this section, among other things, as Marx’s somewhat playful virtuoso demonstration of the ease with which he can surpass Hegel by embedding certain core concepts of “dialectics” by revealing the ways in which certain dimensions of collective practice possess practically dialectical properties.[...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: An Aside on the Category of Capital</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/09/12/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: An Aside on the Category of Capital]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/fragment-on-textual-strategy-in-capital/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] just in case it has escaped attention, the first chapter of &lt;em&gt;Capital&lt;/em&gt; - although I obviously think it deserves great attention - does not actually deploy &lt;em&gt;the category of capital&lt;/em&gt; (which, in the scheme of things, one would imagine would be a fairly important category to analyse...).  Instead, the phenomenological perspective it analyses remains within commodity production and exchange, which means, among other things, that the concept of the fetish &lt;em&gt;as discussed here&lt;/em&gt; is therefore primarily directed at the &quot;Cartesian&quot; forms of perception that are expressed in this dimension of collective experience. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just in case it has escaped attention, the first chapter of <em>Capital</em> &#8211; although I obviously think it deserves great attention &#8211; does not actually deploy <em>the category of capital</em> (which, in the scheme of things, one would imagine would be a fairly important category to analyse&#8230;).  Instead, the phenomenological perspective it analyses remains within commodity production and exchange, which means, among other things, that the concept of the fetish <em>as discussed here</em> is therefore primarily directed at the &#8220;Cartesian&#8221; forms of perception that are expressed in this dimension of collective experience. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

