<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ticket Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2007/08/02/ticket-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/08/02/ticket-insurance/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/08/02/ticket-insurance/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Pepperell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/ticket-insurance/#comment-996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the same thoughts about the insurance sellers - since the premiums don&#039;t seem to be tiny, relative to the cost of tickets, and since the existence of the insurance seems widely known, you&#039;d think authorities would start tinkering with the ticket price or inspection regime - unless there&#039;s an informal arrangement with the insurance sellers?

I hadn&#039;t realised Australia had had, and then abolished, TV licences, although I&#039;m familiar with the concept.  The US has never had them - federalistically complicated, I suppose...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same thoughts about the insurance sellers &#8211; since the premiums don&#8217;t seem to be tiny, relative to the cost of tickets, and since the existence of the insurance seems widely known, you&#8217;d think authorities would start tinkering with the ticket price or inspection regime &#8211; unless there&#8217;s an informal arrangement with the insurance sellers?</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t realised Australia had had, and then abolished, TV licences, although I&#8217;m familiar with the concept.  The US has never had them &#8211; federalistically complicated, I suppose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2007/08/02/ticket-insurance/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/ticket-insurance/#comment-995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the pointer NP.  It raises all sorts of weird efficiency issues.  The insurance sellers are effectively ticket sellers, but at a lower price.  At least in theory, the railway company/gov&#039;t could either increase the incidence of fines, raise the level of the fine, or reduce the ticket price to eliminate the insurance sellers, and go back to a single ticketing system.  According to &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/2007/03/26/how-to-cheat-the-mumbai-train-system/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this discussion&lt;/a&gt;, it has existed for some time, so the insurance business seems to be limited by geographical/funding constraints: a subset of commuters from sparse areas where finding the ticket-less is hard.

Funnily enough, I had an additional reminder of this post yesterday, since the boss at work was reminiscing on &lt;a href=&#039;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TV licensing fees&lt;/a&gt;.  A system, that needless to say, we&#039;ve since discarded. in favour of general taxation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer NP.  It raises all sorts of weird efficiency issues.  The insurance sellers are effectively ticket sellers, but at a lower price.  At least in theory, the railway company/gov&#8217;t could either increase the incidence of fines, raise the level of the fine, or reduce the ticket price to eliminate the insurance sellers, and go back to a single ticketing system.  According to <a href='http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/2007/03/26/how-to-cheat-the-mumbai-train-system/' rel="nofollow">this discussion</a>, it has existed for some time, so the insurance business seems to be limited by geographical/funding constraints: a subset of commuters from sparse areas where finding the ticket-less is hard.</p>
<p>Funnily enough, I had an additional reminder of this post yesterday, since the boss at work was reminiscing on <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence' rel="nofollow">TV licensing fees</a>.  A system, that needless to say, we&#8217;ve since discarded. in favour of general taxation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

