<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dead Weight of Tradition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2006/12/22/the-dead-weight-of-tradition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2006/12/22/the-dead-weight-of-tradition/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What in the hell &#8230; :: &#8230; does tailoring produce? :: March :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2006/12/22/the-dead-weight-of-tradition/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What in the hell &#8230; :: &#8230; does tailoring produce? :: March :: 2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/the-dead-weight-of-tradition/#comment-421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Though therefore it is impossible for things so different to become commensurable in the strict sense,our demand furnishes a sufficiently accurate common measure for practical purposes. There must therefore be some one standard, and this accepted by agreement (which is why it is called nomisma, customary currency).&#8221; (Rackham. The Penguin edition of Capital [p151] cites the 1926 Loeb edition of the Nicomachean Ethics, which is I believe an edition of the Rackham translation. See commentaries on Marx&#8217;s comments on Aristotle at the Archive and at Roughtheory.) [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Though therefore it is impossible for things so different to become commensurable in the strict sense,our demand furnishes a sufficiently accurate common measure for practical purposes. There must therefore be some one standard, and this accepted by agreement (which is why it is called nomisma, customary currency).&#8221; (Rackham. The Penguin edition of Capital [p151] cites the 1926 Loeb edition of the Nicomachean Ethics, which is I believe an edition of the Rackham translation. See commentaries on Marx&#8217;s comments on Aristotle at the Archive and at Roughtheory.) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

