<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Structure of Scientific Revolutions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roughtheory.org/2005/03/13/the-social-structure-of-scientific-revolutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roughtheory.org/2005/03/13/the-social-structure-of-scientific-revolutions/</link>
	<description>Theory In The Rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: socratus</title>
		<link>http://roughtheory.org/2005/03/13/the-social-structure-of-scientific-revolutions/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[socratus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/the-social-structure-of-scientific-revolutions#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Religion and Physics. XXIc.  Who am I ?
 My personal experience. Who am I ?
According to advice of parapsychologist Israel Levinshtein, I learned religious practice-meditation. And once, involuntary, I felt that on my brain there came vibration wave. This wave caused vibration of all neutrons of my brain. They started vibrating in the same phase, with the same frequency that the last wave. All the neutrons came to homogeneous &quot;vacuum&quot; state. And then I saw &quot;myself&quot;, my spiritual essence. i gazed and saw clean silver circle. And I initially understood that this circle is my true &quot;I&quot;. And this true &quot;I&quot; is eternal, unwounded, passionless, spiritual, conscious, evolutionary. It was so exactly, so clear, so real that then, recollecting and telling someone about it, I told him  that it was &quot;more real than I am talking to you&quot;.
Most of all amazed me that my true &quot;I&quot; is passionless. Because I am an emotional person. How is that that I am passionless? And I somehow mentally asked: And what about love?&quot; and mentally received the answer: &quot;Way&quot;.
When the vision of true &quot;I&quot; disappeared, the first thought came. And this thought drove on all the neutrons of the brain, having programmed them with one question: &quot;how to explain it scientifically?&quot;  And I became a slave of this question. All my time was devoted to the search of the answer to this question.
*                 *             *            
It can, not be that the Nature was arranged so strange, 
as the physics think of her. Their thinking is so strange,
that they offer  paradoxical ideas.
                              *                 *             *            
Many of physics consider, that: &quot; the Physics is first of all Vacuum. &quot;
 P. Dirac wrote:
&quot; Ð¢he problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem worth now before  physics.
Really, if you canâ€™t correctly describe vacuum,
how it is possible expect for the correct  description something more complex? &quot;.
It is completely correct.
Physics in Vacuum have groped true and condition
of infinite / eternal Vacuum  characterized
with one simple physical parameter T=0K.
The philosophy of science begins from T=0K .
The physics begins from  T=0K.
The religion begins from T=0K .
The origin of Existence begins from T=0K .
                  *                 *                       *
  Can we know anything concretely about God ?
 Whether it is possible to explain religion with the help of the
 physical and mathematical theorems?
               Yes. It is possible.
Because to create all MATERIAL WORLD  the God
 could only working in any an absolute reference system
and only under any physical and mathematical laws.
*            *           *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site
http://www.socratus.com
Best regards.
Socratus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion and Physics. XXIc.  Who am I ?<br />
 My personal experience. Who am I ?<br />
According to advice of parapsychologist Israel Levinshtein, I learned religious practice-meditation. And once, involuntary, I felt that on my brain there came vibration wave. This wave caused vibration of all neutrons of my brain. They started vibrating in the same phase, with the same frequency that the last wave. All the neutrons came to homogeneous &#8220;vacuum&#8221; state. And then I saw &#8220;myself&#8221;, my spiritual essence. i gazed and saw clean silver circle. And I initially understood that this circle is my true &#8220;I&#8221;. And this true &#8220;I&#8221; is eternal, unwounded, passionless, spiritual, conscious, evolutionary. It was so exactly, so clear, so real that then, recollecting and telling someone about it, I told him  that it was &#8220;more real than I am talking to you&#8221;.<br />
Most of all amazed me that my true &#8220;I&#8221; is passionless. Because I am an emotional person. How is that that I am passionless? And I somehow mentally asked: And what about love?&#8221; and mentally received the answer: &#8220;Way&#8221;.<br />
When the vision of true &#8220;I&#8221; disappeared, the first thought came. And this thought drove on all the neutrons of the brain, having programmed them with one question: &#8220;how to explain it scientifically?&#8221;  And I became a slave of this question. All my time was devoted to the search of the answer to this question.<br />
*                 *             *<br />
It can, not be that the Nature was arranged so strange,<br />
as the physics think of her. Their thinking is so strange,<br />
that they offer  paradoxical ideas.<br />
                              *                 *             *<br />
Many of physics consider, that: &#8221; the Physics is first of all Vacuum. &#8221;<br />
 P. Dirac wrote:<br />
&#8221; Ð¢he problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,<br />
is the basic problem worth now before  physics.<br />
Really, if you canâ€™t correctly describe vacuum,<br />
how it is possible expect for the correct  description something more complex? &#8220;.<br />
It is completely correct.<br />
Physics in Vacuum have groped true and condition<br />
of infinite / eternal Vacuum  characterized<br />
with one simple physical parameter T=0K.<br />
The philosophy of science begins from T=0K .<br />
The physics begins from  T=0K.<br />
The religion begins from T=0K .<br />
The origin of Existence begins from T=0K .<br />
                  *                 *                       *<br />
  Can we know anything concretely about God ?<br />
 Whether it is possible to explain religion with the help of the<br />
 physical and mathematical theorems?<br />
               Yes. It is possible.<br />
Because to create all MATERIAL WORLD  the God<br />
 could only working in any an absolute reference system<br />
and only under any physical and mathematical laws.<br />
*            *           *<br />
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site<br />
<a href="http://www.socratus.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.socratus.com</a><br />
Best regards.<br />
Socratus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

